My mother and I had an interesting conversation this weekend. We were discussing stars who are aging nicely, the ones who still can cause my heart to race despite the graying hair and the increased wrinkles. Me, I think Paul McCartney is still really cute. Not so much handsome, but cute. Then, there's Robert Redford, Harrison Ford, Richard Gere, all of whom are LOOKING GOOD.
We had some disagreement when we began to discuss those that might be considered physically unattractive, you know, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I could not convince Mother that despite the thin, gaunt face with continuous wrinkles, Mick Jagger was not ugly. I never thought he was good-looking. I didn't have his pictures on my walls as a teenager with those of Davy Jones or Bobby Sherman. I couldn't convince her that his eyes twinkled and that in most of the images I googled for her, he just looked very happy and content. She said he was still ugly. When I mentioned the physical unattractiveness of Steven Tyler, she was quick to disagree!!! If only he'd cut his hair and wear better clothes, he'd be nice-looking, she declared. (Never in a million years did I think I would ever hear my mother say Steven Tyler was good-looking!)
So, she didn't agree with me about Mick, and I didn't agree with her about Steven. But, we did agree on the physical unattractiveness of one old star, Keith Richards. Bless his heart. I wonder if his pictures were on anyone's walls.
No comments:
Post a Comment